#SlamTheScam: Governments and Companies Join Forces Against Fraud

In an important show of unity, federal, state, and local governments, alongside non-profit organizations and private companies, are gearing up for National Slam the Scam Day on March 6, 2025. This collaborative initiative aims to arm consumers with the knowledge and tools needed to combat the ever-growing threat of scams, which have reached unprecedented levels of scale and sophistication in recent years.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has sounded the alarm on the escalating financial toll of scams, reporting that consumers lost a staggering $10 billion to fraudulent schemes in 2023 alone. Among the most pervasive were investment scams, which drained over $4.6 billion from victims, and imposter scams, costing nearly $2.7 billion. These figures underscore the urgency of raising awareness and fostering proactive measures to protect the public.

A Threat to All

Scammers don’t discriminate—individuals, businesses, and even government agencies are all in their crosshairs. Using cunning tactics, fraudsters often impersonate representatives from trusted entities, such as well-known companies, charities, or government offices. Their methods are as varied as they are deceptive: some dangle the promise of prizes or lucrative financial windfalls, while others prey on emotions by claiming a loved one is in danger. Increasingly, scammers are exploiting emerging technologies and psychological pressure to trick victims into acting quickly, leaving little time for skepticism or verification.

What makes these scams particularly insidious is their reliance on payment methods that are difficult—or impossible—to trace. Cryptocurrency, gift cards, prepaid debit cards, wire transfers, cash, and even gold bars have become the currencies of choice for fraudsters. In some cases, scammers pose as "helpers" offering to safeguard victims’ money, only to disappear with the funds.

A Call to Action

National Slam the Scam Day is more than a symbolic event—it’s a rallying cry for vigilance and education. Organizers are encouraging the public to follow and share the hashtag #SlamTheScam on social media platforms like X, spreading critical advice to friends, family, and communities. Experts urge consumers to adopt a healthy dose of skepticism toward unsolicited contact, whether it’s a phone call, email, or text message. The advice is simple but effective: hang up, delete, and don’t click. Suspicious links, in particular, can lead to phishing sites designed to steal personal information or install malware.

For those who encounter a scam, the FTC provides a clear path forward. Victims and concerned citizens alike are encouraged to report incidents at reportfraud.ftc.gov, helping authorities track and dismantle fraudulent operations. Additionally, the FTC’s dedicated resource page, ftc.gov/scams, offers up-to-date information on the latest scam trends and tactics, empowering consumers to stay one step ahead of the perpetrators.

A Growing Crisis

The rise in scam-related losses reflects a troubling evolution in criminal ingenuity. Investment scams, often promising unrealistically high returns, have surged as more people seek financial opportunities in an uncertain economy. Imposter scams, meanwhile, exploit trust by mimicking legitimate organizations or individuals—sometimes even using spoofed phone numbers or official-looking emails to enhance their credibility. The emotional and financial devastation left in their wake has prompted this nationwide push to educate and protect.

As National Slam the Scam Day approaches, organizers hope to turn the tide against these pervasive threats. By uniting government agencies, non-profits, and private sector partners, the initiative seeks not only to raise awareness but also to build a resilient, scam-savvy public. On March 6, the message will be loud and clear: scammers may be relentless, but so is the resolve to stop them.

For more information and tips on staying safe, visit ftc.gov/scams and join the conversation with #SlamTheScam.

Nevada’s Political Landscape Shifts: A New Centrist Battleground Emerges

In the early weeks of 2025, Nevada’s political identity appears to be undergoing a subtle yet significant transformation. Recent data from Noble Predictive Insights’ (NPI) Nevada Public Opinion Pulse (NVPOP), collected between January 14–17, offers a fresh snapshot of voter sentiment in the Silver State. Based on responses from 813 registered voters—with a margin of error of ±3.44%—the survey paints a picture of a state drifting away from its traditionally center-left leanings and stepping firmly into the role of a centrist battleground.

A State in Transition

For years, Nevada has been a reliable bellwether, oscillating between Democratic and Republican influences while maintaining a slight progressive tilt. However, the latest NVPOP findings suggest a political realignment may be underway. This shift, emerging in the wake of the 2024 election cycle, marks the first time in recent memory that Nevada’s electorate is showing signs of shedding its center-left label in favor of a more balanced, pragmatic stance.

What’s driving this change? The survey doesn’t pinpoint a single cause, but the numbers hint at a growing openness to Republican messaging, coupled with a cautious optimism about the state’s future. Nevada, long a political microcosm of the nation, seems to be mirroring broader national trends—where voters are increasingly skeptical of ideological extremes and drawn to practical solutions.

GOP Gains Momentum

One of the standout findings from the NVPOP is the uptick in optimism among Nevadans. A solid 53% of respondents believe the state is heading in the right direction—the highest level of confidence recorded in the past year. By contrast, 47% feel Nevada is veering off course. While the split isn’t overwhelming, it’s a notable departure from the gloomier sentiments that dominated 2024.

This newfound positivity could signal a boon for the Nevada Republican Party, which appears to be gaining ground in the state. The GOP’s messaging—often centered on economic stability and local priorities—may be resonating with a populace eager for reassurance after years of political tumult. Nevada’s voters, historically pragmatic, seem to be rewarding a platform that aligns with their immediate concerns rather than lofty ideological promises.

A Centrist Future?

Nevada’s shift toward the center doesn’t mean it’s abandoning its progressive roots entirely. Instead, it reflects a maturing electorate that’s less tethered to party loyalty and more focused on results. With the 2024 election in the rearview mirror, the state’s political future looks less predictable—and more competitive—than ever.

For political strategists, this realignment presents both challenges and opportunities. Nevada Democrats will need to adapt to a electorate that’s no longer a safe bet, while Republicans have a chance to solidify their gains in a state that’s proven elusive in the past. Nevada’s transformation into a true battleground could make it a critical player in shaping national outcomes in the years ahead.

As the dust settles from 2024, one thing is clear: Nevada is no longer content to sit quietly on the sidelines of America’s political divide. With a centrist wind blowing through the desert, the Silver State is poised to redefine its role on the national stage.

To view the poll, visit https://www.noblepredictiveinsights.com/post/nevada-a-political-landscape-in-transition.

Nevada Police Union Calls for Action as PERS Contributions Set to Rise

CARSON CITY, NV - An open letter has been issued to Nevada legislators, spotlighting significant concerns over the impending increase in the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) contribution rates, which is poised to impact Nevada State Police officers starting July 1, 2025.

The letter warns that the planned hike in contribution rates will severely affect the financial well-being of police officers, potentially hampering recruitment and retention within the force. Under the new rates, contributions for state police under the Employer-Pay plan will escalate from 50.00% to 58.75%, while those under the Employee/Employer plan will see an increase from 25.75% to 30.00%. This adjustment would make Nevada's rates among the highest in the nation for police officers.

The increase, equating to an additional 8.75% of contributions, comes at a time when inflation is hovering between 2-3%, significantly reducing the take-home pay for officers. This financial strain is expected to hit new recruits the hardest, with nearly a third of their earnings potentially being allocated to PERS.

Dan Gordon, President of the Nevada Police Union, emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, "Our law enforcement officers risk their lives daily to keep our state safe. It's imperative that our legislators take immediate action to ensure that the retirement system does not become a financial burden on these dedicated public servants. We expect proactive involvement and innovative solutions from our lawmakers to address this urgent issue."

The Nevada Police Union is urging lawmakers to prioritize the welfare of law enforcement officers in their legislative decisions, ensuring that the integrity and functionality of public safety services are not compromised by these financial burdens.

The Political Shift of Nevada Voters

Reno, NV – In a political landscape that has been dominated by Democrats for nearly two decades, Nevada has witnessed a surprising turn of events. For the first time since the early 2000s, the state now counts more registered Republicans than Democrats, marking a significant shift in the political dynamics of this key battleground state.

A Historic Reversal

As of November 2024, the Democratic lead in voter registration, once a stronghold, dwindled to a mere 6,000 voters. This change comes in a state boasting over 2 million active registered voters, highlighting a dramatic erosion of Democratic dominance. The numbers tell the story: 617,204 Republicans now stand against 616,863 Democrats. However, both parties are overshadowed by a burgeoning group of nonpartisans, which since August 2022 has emerged as Nevada's largest voting bloc with nearly 692,000 members.

The Nonpartisan Factor

The rise of nonpartisan voters is not just a statistic but a reflection of broader voter disillusionment or perhaps a quest for political independence. Over the last four years, both major parties have seen their share of the electorate diminish relative to nonpartisans. Republicans, however, have managed to lose fewer supporters than Democrats, which has contributed to their unexpected lead.

Symbolic Victory and Strategic Shifts

This change in voter registration is more than symbolic for the Nevada GOP; it's a tangible victory after Republicans clinched the state in the presidential election for the first time since 2004. With Democrats no longer enjoying their registration advantage, Republicans, known for higher voter turnout, might find the path to future victories somewhat smoother.

Both parties are now adjusting their strategies accordingly. With automatic voter registration in place, the focus has shifted from merely getting people to register to persuading those who are already registered, especially the crucial nonpartisan voters.

The Clark County Conundrum

The bulk of Nevada's political action unfolds in Clark County, home to nearly three-quarters of the state's electorate. Historically, Democratic strength here has countered the Republican leanings in rural Nevada. In Joe Biden's 2020 win, Democrats had a significant 12-percentage point lead in voter registration in Clark County, translating into a 9-point victory in the county. Fast forward to 2024, and the Democratic lead in voter registration in Clark County has halved to about 6 percentage points, contributing to Kamala Harris's narrow defeat in Nevada.

Looking Ahead

The upcoming elections for statewide positions will be the first real test of this new Republican voter registration advantage. Can they maintain this lead? The focus will particularly be on defending Governor Joe Lombardo's bid for a second term.

This shift in Nevada's voter registration landscape isn't just about numbers; it's about changing narratives, voter sentiment, and strategic recalibration by both parties. As this trend continues, Nevada's role as a bellwether state in American politics could become even more pronounced, with implications reaching far beyond its borders.

All eyes are now on how these shifts influence political campaigns, voter turnout, and ultimately, the control of this pivotal state. Whether this marks a long-term change or a temporary blip in Nevada's political graph remains one of the most intriguing questions in American politics today.

SPCSA Surpasses WCSD in Student Enrollment

Carson City, NV – In a significant shift within Nevada's educational sector, the Nevada State Public Charter School Authority (SPCSA) has now become the second-largest public school district in the state, surpassing the Washoe County School District (WCSD) in student numbers. This milestone was reached following the SPCSA Board's decision last Friday, January 24, to accept the transfer of six charter schools from the Clark County School District (CCSD).

The six schools involved in the transfer are Delta Academy, Explore Knowledge Academy, Future Edge Academy, Innovations International Charter School of Nevada, Odyssey Charter School, and Rainbow Dreams Academy, which together have added 5,550 students to the SPCSA's tally. Now, the SPCSA boasts an enrollment of 69,159 students.

This development highlights a growing preference among Nevada families for charter schools, which are often praised for their innovative educational approaches, diversity, and accountability. During the "State of the SPCSA" presentation, Executive Director Melissa Mackedon elaborated on this growth:

• Enrollment Surge: The SPCSA's student count now exceeds that of WCSD, signaling a pivotal change in Nevada's educational landscape.

• Geographic Distribution: The SPCSA oversees 80 charter school campuses spread across five counties: Churchill, Clark, Elko, Washoe, and White Pine. Notably, 85% of these schools are situated in Clark County.

• Focus on Disadvantaged Communities: 79% of the new charter school campuses under SPCSA's sponsorship are classified as Title I schools, dedicated to serving students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.

• Expansion of Educational Choices: In the last five years, the SPCSA has supported the establishment of 22 new charter school campuses, significantly broadening the educational options available to Nevada's public school students.

• Academic Outcomes: According to the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) test results, students at SPCSA-sponsored schools have consistently outperformed the state average in both math and English Language Arts across grades 3 to 8.

This shift in enrollment numbers not only reflects changing preferences among parents and guardians but also underscores the impact of educational policy and school choice in Nevada. The SPCSA's growth is seen as a testament to the effectiveness and appeal of charter schools in providing quality education tailored to diverse community needs.

Nevada Division of Insurance Recovers Over $9.4 Million for Consumers in 2024

CARSON CITY, NV - In a landmark year for consumer advocacy, the Nevada Division of Insurance (NDI) has announced an impressive recovery of $9,400,385.97 for Nevada residents in 2024. This financial restitution was achieved through the diligent work of the Division's Consumer Services section, which successfully closed 4,194 consumer complaint cases throughout the year.

The Consumer Services and Investigations teams at NDI are tasked with navigating the complex landscape of insurance disputes, ensuring that Nevadans receive the benefits and services they are entitled to under their insurance policies. Their efforts not only bring resolution to disputes but also underscore the Division's role in safeguarding consumer rights against insurance companies.

Commissioner Scott Kipper praised the Consumer Services team for their remarkable achievements, stating, "The accomplishments of the Consumer Services section this year are truly outstanding. Their dedication to resolving consumer issues has resulted in recoveries that surpass previous Fiscal Year records, further highlighting the Division's unwavering commitment to protecting Nevada consumers."

This year's figures represent a significant milestone for NDI, demonstrating not only growth in the number of cases handled but also in the amount of money recovered for consumers. The services provided by NDI cover a broad spectrum of insurance types, including auto, home, health, dental, life, commercial, service warranty, title, workers' compensation, surety bonds, and bail bonds.

For Nevadans facing issues with their insurance providers, the Division offers a clear path to resolution. Consumers are encouraged to reach out to the Nevada Division of Insurance for assistance with any insurance-related questions or complaints. This proactive approach ensures that individuals are not left to navigate these often complex issues alone.

The success of the Consumer Services section in 2024 not only reflects the Division's commitment to consumer protection but also serves as a reminder of the importance of regulatory bodies in maintaining fairness in the insurance market. As the Division continues to advocate for consumer rights, it solidifies its role as a pivotal protector in Nevada's insurance sector.

For more information or to file a complaint, consumers can visit the Nevada Division of Insurance website. This initiative by NDI is a testament to the ongoing efforts to enhance consumer protection in the ever-evolving insurance landscape.

Academica Nevada Schools top state’s grad rate at 99.1%

Las Vegas, NV - Public charter schools supported by Academica Nevada, the state's top education services provider, achieved an astounding 99.1% graduation rate, significantly surpassing Nevada's average of 81%.

In contrast, the state's two largest school districts, Clark and Washoe Counties, report graduation rates of 81.4%. Academica Nevada's schools celebrated the graduation of 1,110 students in the most recent academic year, with a detailed breakdown showing 437 students earning college and career-ready diplomas, 100 securing advanced diplomas, and 559 receiving standard high school diplomas.

Renee Fairless, Principal at Mater Academy - East Las Vegas, highlighted her school's success in a Title 1 community, boasting a graduation rate over 98%. "Nearly half of our graduates earned college and career-ready diplomas, with 17 also achieving an Associate of Arts degree," she remarked, crediting this milestone to the concerted efforts of the school's teachers, students, and families.

Ryan Reeves, COO of Academica Nevada, pointed out that these results come despite the schools operating with only 70% of the funding available to other district schools. "Our commitment to excellence is reflected in the achievements of our students, driven by the hard work of our principals, the passion of our teachers, and community support," Reeves said, highlighting the benefits of school autonomy and innovative educational strategies.

The success of Nevada public charter schools is supported by a strong focus on both educators and students. Teachers receive ongoing professional development, while students benefit from smaller class sizes, cutting-edge technology, personalized learning plans based on data, and targeted support for those who need it.

Academica Nevada supports more than 34,000 students across seven charter school networks, including CIVICA Academy, Doral Academy, and Somerset Academy. Enrollment for the next academic year opens from January 3rd to February 28th, 2024, with lotteries set for March 3rd. More information can be found at academicanv.org.

The full list of graduation rates and class sizes for the Class of 2024, including comparisons to 2023 graduation rates can be found HERE. For more information on the Nevada Report Card, visit nevadareportcard.nv.gov.

The 2024 Election: A Mirror to Media Bias

Frankly, the 2024 U.S. presidential election has once again revealed entrenched biases. These biases are particularly evident within Democratic Party-aligned media, pollsters, and pundits. This election cycle, where President Donald Trump alongside his running mate, Senator JD Vance (R-OH), triumphed over Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz (D-MN), underscores a persistent issue that not only misleads public perception but threatens the integrity of democratic processes. However, it appears that voters are beginning to see through the bias, though ideally, they shouldn't need to.

The Media's Trump Conundrum

The portrayal of Trump by mainstream media outlets - ABC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC - has long been a topic of scrutiny. Here's how the narrative unfolded:

• Early Trump Era (2016 - 2017): Studies from the Media Research Center and Pew Research Center painted a picture of unprecedented negative coverage. In Trump's initial 60 days in office, Pew reported a staggering 62% of his coverage was negative, with only a paltry 5% positive. This was in stark contrast to the coverage received by President Barack Obama.

• Mid-term and Late Presidency (2018 - 2020): The trend didn't wane; instead, it intensified. The 2018 MRC study noted 92% of Trump's coverage was negative, escalating to 95% by 2020, with the media's spotlight firmly fixed on his controversies rather than policy achievements.

• 2024 Election Cycle: The bias was palpable. Insights from MRC and social media sentiments on X (formerly Twitter) showed Trump facing an 85% negative coverage, while Harris enjoyed 78% positive, one of the most skewed portrayals in recent times.

This consistent negative slant towards Trump, focusing predominantly on political opinions of his persona rather than analysis of his policies, suggests a deep-rooted bias within many media narratives, particularly those with a liberal audience base.

In Nevada, media bias is clearly evident in the work of Jon Ralston, the political editor of The Nevada Independent. Despite his 30 years of experience in journalism and numerous achievements, he frequently fails to recognize his own biases, which have increasingly intensified over the years. In a state where nonpartisan voters predominate, one might expect Nevada journalists to provide news coverage that is either nonpartisan or reflects all perspectives. However, Mr. Ralston appears to miss this point.

The reality is that extreme media bias and distorted narratives have detrimental effects on democracy. As viewers and readers become aware of these biases, trust in media as an objective source of information diminishes. Further, echo chambers form, where individuals only consume information that aligns with their views, further polarizing the electorate.

The Way Forward

The outcome of the 2024 election should prompt a deep introspection within the media. Journalists and media personalities must critically evaluate their personal biases, striving for a balance that encourages informed debate rather than division.

For us, as consumers of news, we must demand transparency and accountability from our information sources, pushing for coverage that reflects the full spectrum of political discourse.

The 2024 election serves as a stark reminder of the need for a more nuanced approach to media coverage. Only through such reflection and reform can we hope to restore trust in our democratic processes and the media's role within them. As we move forward, the challenge will be to confront and correct the cultural and political biases that currently distort our democratic narrative.

GOTV Efforts in Nevada: A Nonpartisan Overview

As Nevada's political scene heats up with the approach of election day, both major parties are pulling out all stops in their get-out-the-vote (GOTV) campaigns, leveraging a mix of traditional canvassing, digital outreach, and community engagement to sway the voter turnout in their favor. Here's an inside look at how these efforts are unfolding across the Silver State.

The ground game battle

The ground game efforts to get out the vote for the 2024 election have showcased a blend of traditional canvassing and innovative voter outreach strategies. Both major political parties have intensified their efforts, with Democrats leveraging a robust field operation, highlighted by Vice President Harris's engagement in labor union strong hold Las Vegas. Conversely, the Trump campaign, while maintaining a lower visibility in terms of physical presence, has adopted a unique approach by focusing on activating "low-propensity voters" through a network of precinct captains who encourage early voting and mail-in ballots. This strategy, combined with significant support from outside groups, aims to counteract the Democrats' vast advantage in campaign money and grassroots mobilization. Additionally, posts on X indicate a high level of engagement, reflecting the dynamic and closely contested nature of Nevada's electoral landscape.

Leveraging technology and social media

Social media platforms, particularly X, have become battlegrounds for voter engagement. Posts from influential figures like Elon Musk have indirectly contributed to the political discourse, urging followers to consider their voting choices, though not explicitly tied to any party's GOTV efforts. These platforms serve as modern-day canvassing tools, where viral content and political endorsements can significantly sway public opinion or at least encourage participation.

Nonpartisan efforts and voter turnout

Amidst the partisan fervor, nonpartisan organizations are making strong pushes. Groups like Vote.org and RockTheVote.org focus on demographic segments traditionally less engaged in voting, using pop culture and digital media to make political participation appealing, especially among younger voters. These efforts aim at increasing the overall voter turnout rather than swaying votes to a particular side.

Looking Ahead

This election in Nevada isn't just about who turns out but how. The blend of old-school canvassing with digital innovation could set a precedent for future electoral campaigns, showcasing the evolving nature of political engagement in the digital age. As the ballots are cast, Nevada's voters will decide not only on candidates but also on the effectiveness of these varied strategies in mobilizing them.

Bad Form

In the dusty, desert town of Pahrump, Nevada, Margery quietly leads a rabble of enthusiasts seeking progress beyond the political status quo. Margery is a political zealot. Middle-aged. Cosmetologist. Self-proclaimed eco-socialist. She leads the Nevada Green Party, a minor-political party that focuses on environmentalism and social justice. Like a locker combination, the Green Party is easy to forget. They have faded from the political radar, tucked away in the attic of memory alongside Ralph Nader's 2000 presidential bid and the Y2K panic.

While the Nevada Green Party managed to qualify for the 2008 ballot, marking one of their notable achievements, their access was not consistently maintained in subsequent elections. For years, they languished in obscurity, their quest for relevance as fruitless as trying to catch the wind. They were not just sidelined from the political feast; they weren't even permitted to enter the banquet hall. But this year, the door creaked open, if only slightly, hinting at a seat they might finally claim.

Our political landscape is a chessboard where only two players are allowed to move, forcing every pawn to choose between black or white, with no room for shades of gray. The Democratic and Republican duopoly has effectively penned voters into a binary choice, like choosing between two foods when you're craving a whole buffet. Minor or third political parties are regarded as spoilers and therefore immensely defamed and attacked. The Green Party has continued to defend their mission, reminding critics that even the now behemoth Republican Party formed in 1854 as a minor-political party.

Margery is a true believer, committed to progress. To get ballot access for the 2024 general election, Margery’s Greens were required to obtain 10,095 valid signatures from Nevada voters. Clipboards in hand, they went to work. They didn't just work; they hustled, sweated, and rallied, amassing signatures like there was a gold rush for democracy. In the end, their efforts weren't just met; they were exceeded, tripling the number of signatures required with the tenacity of underdogs who knew the stakes.

In Nevada, the Secretary of State is the authority and administrator of the elections. Nevada is one of the 35 states that elects their Secretary of State. Candidates run with party affiliations, which inherently brings partisanship into the process. While the role might be intended to oversee elections and perform other duties in a nonpartisan way, the actual process of getting elected involves partisan politics. In the 2022 election cycle, Democrat Francisco Aguilar was elected as the Secretary of State.

Nevada’s Democratic Party led Secretary of State’s Office was responsible for providing the Nevada Green Party with the proper requirements and forms for collecting signatures. Enter Heather, an election’s administrator. Heather's digital existence is as elusive as a ghost in daylight. She might either be a cog in the deep-state machine or simply a bureaucratic automaton, punching the clock while reveling in the perks of government employment. Her ideals are totally unknown. Either way, Heather was directly responsible for instructing Margery. 

Prior to circulating its signature-gathering petition, on-a-mission-Margery and the Nevada Green Party filed its initial request with the Secretary of State’s Office on July 10. The petition contained the correct form for minor parties seeking ballot access. Heather responded the same day by email, noting a small technical error in the petition and attached to its email a different form. Turns out Heather instructed Margery to abandon the correct form and use the wrong form. In obedience, Margery and team went back to work pounding the pavement and soon returned with the signatures on Heather’s form. A few days later, they were told the signatures were sufficient and verified by the county clerks and registrars. Margery and her cohort rejoiced in what they thought was their triumphant entry onto Nevada's 2024 ballot. Alas, their political parade was to be a brief one, soon to be rained on by the storms of legal challenges.

Nevada law provides a deadline for legal challenges to ballot access, which in this case was June 10. At the very last moment, as the sun began to dip on June 10, the Nevada Democratic Party initiated a lawsuit to invalidate the Nevada Green Party signatures for using the wrong form for collecting signatures. The very form the Democratic Party led Secretary of State’s office directed them to use. Coincidence or conspiracy? 

“They knew it was the wrong form. I submitted the correct form to begin with and they told me it had been "updated" to the form they gave me.” ~ @GreenPartyNV on X

Heather alleged she mistakenly instructed Margery to use the form for qualifying initiatives and referenda instead of the form to qualify minor party ballot access. At no point did she or anyone at the Secretary of State’s office indicate that they were using the wrong form or that there was any problem with their petition. In fact, they officially declared the Nevada Green Party had qualified for ballot access for the 2024 general election.

Defending its right to exist on the ballot against the Nevada Democratic Party lawsuit, the Nevada Green Party raised a host of state-law arguments in defense and added that denying it ballot access would violate their federal due process and equal protection rights. While the District Court agreed, the higher Nevada Supreme Court didn’t and ruled 5-2 in favor of the Nevada Democratic Party. The court found that despite the Secretary of State directing the Nevada Green Party to use the incorrect form, the Nevada Green Party did not meet the legal requirements for ballot access. They described it as an unfortunate mistake by the Secretary of State’s office that the Nevada Green Party should have caught. 

Nevada Supreme Court Justices Kristina Pickering and Douglas Herndon dissented, expressing concerns over due process violations and the potential injustice caused by the Secretary of State's error. Herndon wrote that it is unreasonable to expect a minor party to double check the petition sent by the Secretary of State’s office, which “is supposed to be the primary authority on elections in Nevada.”

“It also shocks the conscience, offends judicial notions of fairness, and contributes to a distrust in the election process in Nevada,” Herndon wrote, which Pickering concurred.

While the Court believed there was no evidence that the Secretary of State’s office intentionally misled the Nevada Green Party by instructing them to use the wrong form, this wasn’t the only time they misled a minor political party. Before he suspended his campaign, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s campaign was also ensnared in the Secretary of State's office's web of misinformation.

Following the Nevada Supreme Court's decision, the Green Party sought intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting an emergency stay to allow the Nevada Green Party candidate on the ballot, emphasizing the democratic right of Nevadans to have more electoral choices.

In a twist that could only be scripted in the theater of the absurd, the Nevada Secretary of State's office, with a flourish of irony, accused the Nevada Green Party of trying to jam the gears of election machinery. U.S. Supreme Justice Elena Kagan, perhaps with a judicial side-eye, nodded in agreement. Thus, with a gavel of fate, she sealed the Nevada Green Party's exclusion from Nevada's 2024 electoral dance, leaving them on the sidelines, spectators in their own political saga.

With all avenues exhausted, Margery retreated back to Pahrump. Her journey was marked not by defiance, but by disillusionment. She had traced the path laid before her, adhering meticulously to the directives of the very guardians of democracy. Yet, in an ironic twist, these same custodians of electoral trust, who vow to champion the voice of the electorate, inadvertently steered her towards disenfranchisement. The roadmap to representation, it seems, was flawed from the start. 

Was it deep-state sabotage or mere oversight? Heather's role in this electoral drama might fuel the conspiracists' fire, yet as the ballots hit boxes, the truth behind her actions becomes as irrelevant as yesterday's news.

Meanwhile the case underscores the complexities of ballot access laws, where minor errors, even if not entirely the fault of the party, can lead to exclusion from the ballot. The case also raises questions about the roles of state officials in providing accurate legal guidance and the potential for partisan influence in legal challenges to ballot access.

With an ever tightening race for U.S. President, the impacts of this case could be immense. Nevada's electoral votes may decide the presidency. Given the Electoral College system, where a candidate needs 270 votes to win, Nevada's six votes are not just a number but a critical part of various electoral scenarios. For instance, if the election is tight, with candidates closely clustered around the 270 mark, Nevada's votes could be decisive. 

In 2020, Joe Biden edged out Donald Trump by just 33,596 votes. But delve into history, and you find an even tighter squeeze: Hillary Clinton in 2016 barely outmaneuvered Trump by a mere 27,202 votes, a figure so slim it could slip unnoticed between the cards of a shuffled deck. Enter now the consequences of the Nevada Green Party’s exclusion from the ballot. They amassed nearly 30,000 signatures in support of their campaign and would have likely increased that amount if they continued on. If history is a predictor of the future, Nevada’s winner will be decided by roughly 30,000 votes. Perhaps these votes slip back into the Democratic Party’s favor, helping them secure Nevada’s electoral votes.

This election's outcome will significantly influence domestic and foreign policies, potentially affecting economic strategies, international relations, and judicial appointments, all of which have long-term implications for American and global affairs. Some whisper that we're teetering on the brink of a new global conflict, with America's stance being the fulcrum upon which the world's fate lies. As we head towards an era of new American politics, the presidential election may come down to the winner of the critical swing state of Nevada, and the consequences of a bad form.

END 

Source links:

• Green Party NVSC Filing

• Green Party SCOTUS filing

• NVSOS SCOTUS Filing

• NV Dems SCOTUS Filing

• Green Party Reply SCOTUS Filing

• Decisions:

• https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/nevada-green-party-v-aguilar/

• https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24a262.html

Washoe County School Board targets public charter schools

In a recent Washoe County School Board meeting, Trustees discussed their 2025 legislative priority plan, sparking a robust debate among trustees and community members. The stated primary aim of the proposed plan is to fortify an environment where students can succeed. However, the undertone was that the popularity and high-performance of public charter schools have become a perceived threat to their status quo.

A controversial point of discussion was the role of for-profit vendors that service public charter schools, specifically Education Management Organizations (EMOs) that provide operations and administration services. With minimal dissent, Trustees went on to approve the legislative priority plan four to two, which included language to prohibit public charter schools from employing for-profit EMOs.

“Isn’t it ironic that you’re attacking public charter schools for employing for-profit vendors in the same meeting you approved approximately $7 million in contracts to for-profit vendors?” said Eddie Ableser, an advocate for public charter schools, during public testimony.

Four board members, Trustees Smith, Westlake, Mayberry, and Woodley, voted for the legislative priority plan. Two board members, Trustees Nicolet and Church, voted against the plan. Trustee Rodriguez was not present.

Trustee Nicolet cited concerns about the District targeting EMOs, and Trustee Church defended public charter schools' inclusivity for all students, including those with disabilities.

The Nevada Department of Education aims to set high standards for equity and quality in education. However, the implementation faces hurdles due to bureaucratic inefficiencies, debates over educational policies, and how best to address diverse student needs, including those with disabilities or requiring special education. While public charter schools operate with less funding per pupil (approx. 30% less), their operational flexibility has led to innovative approaches, resulting in a reputation for serving students with individual needs at a higher level than Washoe’s traditional public schools.

Nevada has around 80 public charter school campuses serving approximately 62,000 students, which makes up 13% of the state’s K-12 population. The academic results of public charter schools are held accountable by the State Public Charter School Authority, and the data suggests Nevada’s charter schools are excelling in comparison to their counterparts in traditional public schools. One-third of Nevada’s public charter schools are rated as 5-star schools by the Nevada State Performance Framework rating system, which ranks public schools on a 5-star scale. Overall, 73% are rated 3-stars or higher, significantly higher than the overall rate for nearly all traditional school districts.

According to faculty and parents of public charter school students, the Washoe School District's attacks on their students’ schools are because of their success in educational achievement. 

“Instead of focusing resources on improving Washoe Schools, the District prioritizes harming the public charter schools outperforming them in order to limit parental interest and choice, forcing them to accept the status quo within their traditional public schools,” said a Mater Academy parent.

The discussion around public charter schools versus traditional public schools often boils down to individual school performance, parental satisfaction, and educational options. However, for the proponents of prohibiting public charter schools from hiring for-profit EMOs, the complaints seem to be mostly aimed at Academica Nevada, which provides administration services for several public charter schools in Nevada. The percentage of revenue Washoe County Schools spend on administration is approximately 2% higher than the amount Academica Nevada receives from each school it supports in Northern Nevada. 

Trustees Smith and Woodley alleged that out-of-state Academica offices profit from Nevada taxpayers. According to records, the fees paid to Academica Nevada employ a professional staff of more than 60 Nevadans, including lawyers, accountants, administrators, and other professionals who work directly with the Nevada schools every day. Contracts and expense reports between Academica Nevada and the schools they service are publicly accessible for transparency and accountability.

The meeting underscores the complex dynamics within educational policy-making, with significant implications for Nevada’s public charter schools and the broader educational framework in Washoe County. Critics argue these policies could potentially disadvantage public charter school students, while proponents believe they will enhance the effectiveness of public education. The District's legislative priority plan, now set, will guide their educational policies in the coming years, affecting both students and educators across the region.

Senior Care Association Backs Medicare Advantage

Las Vegas, Nev. -- In a move to bolster health care options for Nevada's senior population, the Personal Care Association of Nevada (PCAN) has thrown its weight behind Medicare Advantage, a program that combines public health insurance with private sector management to serve over 33 million seniors and people with disabilities nationwide.

Robert Crockett, CEO of Advanced Personal Care Solutions, emphasized the importance of Medicare Advantage. "This program is not just beneficial; it's essential for senior care," he stated. "It provides comprehensive services under one umbrella, significantly simplifying healthcare access for our most vulnerable citizens."

Medicare Advantage plans are gaining popularity, with 53% of eligible Medicare beneficiaries choosing these plans over traditional Medicare due to their extensive benefits. These benefits include not only medical care but also dental, fitness, vision, and hearing services, which are becoming increasingly standard across these plans.

The program's appeal lies in its affordability and the breadth of services offered. "Medicare Advantage plans typically come with low monthly premiums and integrate services like nutrition guidance and wellness programs, which are crucial for maintaining or improving health in older age," explained Crockett.

PCAN's endorsement comes at a pivotal time as policymakers and candidates gear up for the upcoming elections. The association is calling on them to protect and potentially expand Medicare Advantage. "Our seniors and disabled community members deserve the peace of mind that comes with knowing their healthcare is secure and comprehensive," Crockett added, urging political figures to make Medicare Advantage a priority in their campaigns.

This support from PCAN is seen as a strategic move to ensure that the voices advocating for better healthcare options for seniors are heard loud and clear in Nevada's political arena. As the election approaches, the healthcare debate, particularly concerning Medicare, is expected to intensify, with Medicare Advantage playing a central role in discussions on quality care for the aging population.

The endorsement not only reflects PCAN's commitment to its members but also underscores a broader trend of recognizing the value of integrated, high-quality care models like Medicare Advantage in enhancing the lives of the elderly and disabled.

Nevada Secretary of State release ballot guide

As Nevada gears up for the 2024 General Election, voters are set to weigh in on a series of significant ballot questions that could reshape various aspects of state law and governance. The Secretary of State’s Office has released the 2024 Ballot Question Guide to assist voters in understanding these critical issues.

Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar emphasized the importance of an informed electorate. "This year, Nevada citizens will have the opportunity to vote on crucial races and ballot questions that impact how we live, learn, or vote. The more informed we are, the better off our state will be," he stated.

The ballot guide, crafted to be accessible, provides straightforward explanations of the seven statewide ballot questions, arguments for and against each, and outlines what would happen should they pass. Notably, the guide is not only available in English but also in many other languages, aiming to reach a broad spectrum of Nevada's diverse population.

Here's a summary of the ballot questions voters will face:

• Question 1 aims to modify the powers of the Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education.

• Question 2 seeks to revise terms related to state support for individuals and entities.

• Question 3 proposes adopting open primaries and ranked-choice voting, potentially changing how elections are conducted.

• Question 4 would remove provisions allowing slavery and involuntary servitude as criminal punishment from the state constitution.

• Question 5 looks to exempt child and adult diapers from certain taxes.

• Question 6 is a pivotal measure to amend the constitution to make abortion access an individual right.

• Question 7 would require a voter ID, potentially affecting voting procedures statewide.

The guide also serves as a voter's manual for the election process, detailing key dates and procedures:

• Early Voting starts on October 19 and continues until November 1.

• Election Day is set for November 5, with polls open from 7 am to 7 pm.

• Voters can register or update their registration up to October 22 to receive a mail ballot.

• All active registered voters will receive a mail ballot unless they opt out, with the requirement that these ballots must be postmarked by Election Day and received by November 9 to be counted.

Voters are encouraged to engage with the ballot guide to make informed decisions. The full guide can be accessed online, providing comprehensive details on each question and its potential impact on Nevada's future. This election promises to be a pivotal moment for the state, with the outcomes of these ballot questions potentially influencing policy, rights, and electoral processes for years to come.

Candidate calls for more campaign safety after being stalked

In the heart of the election campaign for the Nevada System of Higher Education's Board of Regents, candidate Tonia Holmes-Sutton has made a poignant plea for safety and respect among all participants. Amid rising tensions and personal experiences of stalking and intimidation, Holmes-Sutton calls for a unified front in maintaining the integrity and civility of the electoral process.

The call to action from Holmes-Sutton comes at a time when political discourse is increasingly polarized, not just in Las Vegas but nationwide. "Every candidate, volunteer, and voter deserves to participate in the electoral process without fear of intimidation or violence," Holmes-Sutton stated. This statement reflects a broader concern over the safety of political figures and the health of democratic engagement.

Holmes-Sutton, advocating for a safer campaign environment, recommends enhanced security at events and closer ties with law enforcement. She also encourages those facing harassment or threats, especially online, to report such incidents and seek support. "It's crucial for us to stand together," she remarked, emphasizing the role of community and professional services in combating digital threats.

The candidate's message extends beyond personal safety to fostering a positive and inclusive campaign atmosphere. "We must not allow fear and intimidation to undermine the democratic process," she added, highlighting the need for mutual respect and dignity in political discussions. This approach aims to counteract the divisive elements that often surface during election times, promoting a narrative of unity and progress.

Holmes-Sutton's initiative is not just about winning votes but about building a stronger community through a shared commitment to safety and respect. "By standing together and supporting one another, we can create a safer and more respectful environment for everyone involved," she concluded.

As the election season continues, Holmes-Sutton's call serves as a reminder of the values that should underpin democratic processes, urging all involved to engage constructively for the betterment of their community.